| | Posttraumatic stress disorder and injuryAbstract Growing empirical evidence indicates that injury (both intentional and unintentional) is a primary risk factor for posttraumatic stress in children. Most injured children do well, drawing on their own coping skills and the support of their family. However, a small percentage of patients develop distressing posttraumatic symptoms, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Emergency physicians see children and parents at a key time post-injury, and have a unique opportunity to promote psychological resilience and recovery from injury, and to identify individuals in need of further assessment and intervention. This article will review some of the normal psychological responses to trauma, the association between injury and the development of PTSD, risk factors for PTSD, and interventions that can be performed in the emergency department and afterward to prevent serious psychological sequelae.
THOMAS,∗ AGE 9, WAS RIDING his bike with two friends in a city park. As the boys looped in and out of the street, they didn’t see the small truck that rounded the corner and struck Thomas, throwing him from the bike. His two friends ran to find Thomas’ grandmother, who arrived on the scene just in time to join Thomas in the ambulance on the way to the hospital. In the emergency department (ED), Thomas was quiet and compliant, becoming visibly upset only when his grandmother left him briefly to make phone calls to family members. He was treated for a concussion and facial contusions, and admitted to the hospital overnight for observation. In the first few weeks after his injury, his grandmother (his legal guardian and primary caretaker since age four) was concerned. Thomas seemed to jump whenever he heard screeching brakes, he awakened several times with nightmares, and he refused to play with friends in the park near his home (formerly a favorite activity). His grandmother also noticed that she was more “jumpy” herself, and that she felt anxious when Thomas went to play at a friend’s house, worrying about his safety even though she knew the parents well and had always trusted their careful supervision of her grandson.
Keisha,∗ age 15, was on her way to a school dance when the car in which she was a rear seat passenger was hit head-on by another vehicle. Keisha sustained facial abrasions and a fractured tibia, and was transported by ambulance to a pediatric trauma center. Her parents arrived at the ED after about an hour, rushing from dinner at a friend’s home as soon as they heard what had happened. Keisha was intensely worried about her friends (all of whom had minor injuries), and was relieved to see her parents, bursting into tears as soon as they arrived. Her fractured leg was casted in the ED, and she was released home, returning two days later for reevaluation of her injury. Over the next few weeks, Keisha was unable to sleep through the night, and stayed at home much more than normal because she found crutches difficult and became extremely anxious whenever she had to ride in a car. Her mother and father stated that they felt numb and were just coping day to day.
Concepts and definitions: PTSD and the range of normal responses to trauma  In the first few days and weeks following a traumatic event (such as an injury), it is common for children and adults to have unwanted and upsetting thoughts or feelings about the trauma, and to feel more jumpy or on edge (a general sense of being on the lookout for possible danger). Many individuals want to avoid things that remind them of the traumatic event. These reactions appear to be normative: in a recent study, more than four fifths of injured children and their parents reported at least one of these symptoms in the first month post-trauma.1 Certain aspects of these early reactions may even play a role in promoting recovery. For example, repeated mental re-experiencing of the trauma may serve, over time, to reduce the emotional impact of reminders. However, when these posttraumatic stress symptoms persist and impair an individual’s functioning, they may constitute a traumatic stress disorder. Acute stress disorder (ASD) describes particularly problematic early responses to trauma; posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is diagnosed when severe symptoms persist for at least one month (Table 1). PTSD consists of a constellation of re-experiencing, avoidance, and hyper-arousal symptoms following a traumatic experience. While the definition of PTSD requires a specific number of symptoms in each of these symptom categories, individuals may be affected significantly even if their symptom picture does not meet official diagnostic criteria for the disorder.2 Examples of statements that reflect traumatic stress symptoms are provided in Table 2. | | |  | Symptom | ASD | PTSD |  |
 | Dissociation | At least 3 symptoms | Not required |  |
 | Re-experiencing | Persistent | At least 1 symptom |  |
 | Avoidance | Marked | At least 3 symptoms |  |
 | Hyperarousal | Marked | At least 2 symptoms |  |
 | Duration of symptoms | 2 days to 1 month | 1 month or more |  | | | |
| | |  | Category | Statement |  |
 | Fear, helplessness, horror | “I wanted to make it stop happening, but I couldn’t.” |  |
 | Dissociation | “My mind went blank.” |  |
 | | “What was happening seemed unreal to me—like I was in a dream or watching a movie.” |  |
 | Re-experiencing | “Pictures or sounds from what happened keep popping into my mind.” |  |
 | Avoidance | “I am trying not to remember or think about what happened to me.” |  |
 | Arousal | “I feel jumpy.” |  | | | |
PTSD has been identified in the aftermath of experiences as disparate as combat, natural disasters, rape, witnessing violence, and childhood abuse.3, 4, 5 PTSD is not limited to directly experienced traumatic events and may follow vicarious traumatic exposure.6 For example, a parent can develop PTSD after witnessing or learning of his/her child’s injury. In injured adults, posttraumatic stress symptoms have been found to be one of the best predictors of poorer physical and functional recovery,7 highlighting the importance of identifying and treating these symptoms as part of comprehensive medical care.
Prevalence of PTSD after pediatric injury  Significant posttraumatic symptoms have been identified in 22% to 50% of children assessed 1 to 3 months after an unintentional traumatic injury, and in 12% to 29% of children assessed up to one year after an injury.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Injury severity is not associated with the severity of posttraumatic stress responses.9, 10 Traffic crashes appear to be a primary precipitant for PTSD in children, regardless of the nature or severity of injuries sustained.10, 13 PTSD in children and youth from exposure to violence, including witnessing violence in the community, has been well documented, with prevalence rates ranging from 15% to 67%.14, 15, 16 Acute stress symptoms appear to be common among urban youth seen in an ED for violent injury, with more than 80% reporting some symptoms and about one third reporting significant acute posttraumatic distress.17 A recent prospective study found that symptoms of acute stress reported by violently injured youth during acute care in the ED correlate with future reporting of posttraumatic stress symptoms months after the event.15
Risk factors for PTSD after injury  One month after his injury, Thomas’ initial reactions are beginning to resolve. He still jumps when he hears tires squealing, but he no longer has nightmares, and he has been able first to walk through the park with his grandmother, and then to play there with her nearby. He is beginning to think that he may even try to ride his bike again “real soon.” Six months later, Thomas’ grandmother reports that his physical injuries seem completely healed. He has resumed riding his bike, although he appears to be more cautious and no longer rides in the street. With Thomas’ return to bike riding, his grandmother continues to feel somewhat more anxious about his safety than before the injury, but feels able to cope with this, and even jokes about it with her friends and with her grandson. One month after the car crash, Keisha has returned to school and is getting around on crutches. She rides the school bus with no problem, but is extremely anxious whenever she must ride in a car. She no longer wants to hang out with the friends she was traveling with to the dance. Keisha’s mother reports that even though she tries not to think about it, she often has vivid mental images of her daughter trapped and bleeding in the car. She states that her husband is also having difficulty coping. Six months later, Keisha finds that thoughts of the crash frequently intrude, even when she is relaxing with friends. She feels anxious when anything reminds her of the night she was injured, and though she can manage to ride in a car, she tries to avoid sitting in the back seat. To distract herself, she tries to stay busy with work and activities, though she is having a hard time concentrating on her schoolwork. Keisha’s mother frequently thinks about the crash, and feels very anxious whenever Keisha is away from home. Her father tries to avoid the stretch of road where the crash occurred, and states that he still can’t “get over what happened.” Because not every individual exposed to a potentially traumatic event will develop a traumatic stress disorder, it is particularly important to identify associated risk factors (Table 3). The broad empirical literature on posttraumatic stress in adults and children suggests that the following elements are associated with increased risk of PTSD development after any sort of traumatic event: history of prior traumatic experience, perceived life threat during the traumatic event, severity of exposure to the trauma, signs of hyperarousal (eg, elevated heart rate) post-trauma, and (for children) increased parental acute distress.3, 4, 18, 19 Both cases presented here have elements that might point to a risk for poor outcome: Thomas has a history of neglect and abuse, and showed acute symptoms of re-experiencing and avoidance; Keisha was separated from her parents at the time of her injury, was frightened that her friends were hurt, and showed early sleep disturbance, re-experiencing symptoms, and social isolation. The interplay between these risk factors and each child’s resources (his/her psychological resources as well as family and social context) will help to determine the course of psychological recovery after injury.  | History of prior traumatic experience(s) |  |
 | Perceived life threat during the traumatic event |  |
 | Severity of exposure to the trauma |  |
 | Signs of posttraumatic hyperarousal (eg, elevated heart rate) |  |
 | Increased parental acute stress responses |  | | | |
In traumatically injured adults, the research literature indicates that prior trauma, female gender, alcohol use, acute stress disorder symptoms, and physiological arousal (elevated heart rate in the first week after injury) are associated with increased risk of developing PTSD.20, 21, 22, 23, 24 The smaller research literature regarding children’s psychological reactions to traumatic injury generally echoes the risk factors found for adults, and also suggests a key role for parents in children’s recovery. If a child or his/her parent exhibit acute stress reactions soon after the event, the child is more likely to develop PTS symptoms or PTSD.9, 11, 15 Conversely, it has been shown that emotional disclosure between family members after a trauma can promote more positive post-trauma outcomes.25
Parent reactions to pediatric injury  Traumatic stress responses have been reported in parents of children with unintentional injuries1, 10 or burns.26 In one of the few studies to assess parent symptoms prospectively after pediatric injury, 23% of parents had significant acute stress responses within one month of their child’s injury.1 Importantly, a strong relationship has been reported between parent and child posttraumatic stress symptoms after diverse types of traumatic experiences.18, 27, 28 More specifically, for children with traumatic injuries, parents’ acute stress symptoms have been shown to be highly associated with later child PTSD outcomes.9, 11, 29 The potential reasons for this association are many. Children and parents may share an underlying temperamental propensity for anxiety symptoms; parents may model more or less anxious responses that affect the child’s budding repertoire of coping skills; and the parent’s own posttraumatic stress symptoms may adversely affect his/her ability to provide effective support for the child in the aftermath of a traumatic event. Each parent may cope with their own posttraumatic responses differently, as illustrated in the cases presented above. Keisha’s parents were understandably anxious, and because of their own worries had great difficulty assisting their daughter to approach situations she feared. Thomas’ grandmother was able to find ways to manage her increased anxiety concerning his safety, and to assist him in regaining a sense of security and overcoming his desire to avoid the place in which he had been injured. Her help appears to have been pivotal in promoting his resilience in the face of this traumatic experience.
PTSD treatment  While it is beyond the scope of this paper to provide a detailed description of treatment for PTSD, we will outline empirically validated treatment approaches. Pharmacological approaches have been studied for adults. Two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are currently approved for treatment of PTSD in adults; however, there are currently no published controlled studies of pharmacological treatment for PTSD in children.30 First-line treatment for PTSD in children or adults involves cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a specific psychotherapeutic approach that includes exposure therapy, anxiety management training, and “cognitive restructuring.”31, 32, 33 Exposure therapy is provided by a mental health professional who is trained in CBT. Its key element is a carefully guided re-experiencing of the traumatic event within the safe environment of therapy. The therapist first teaches the individual specific anxiety management skills (eg, breathing exercises), and then assists the individual to construct a detailed narrative about the trauma, including events, thoughts, and emotions as they unfolded in the individual’s awareness. This narrative is often written down or recorded on audiotape. In therapy sessions and as homework, the individual reads or listens to the narrative repeatedly, until his/her subjective level of anxiety begins to diminish. When exposure is used with children, it may involve play or other creative methods of re-telling the traumatic experience. Exposure is usually accompanied by cognitive restructuring, in which the therapist assists the individual to identify and challenge maladaptive thoughts (eg, “No matter what I do, I can again be safe”) that help to maintain PTSD symptoms. There is strong empirical evidence that a time-limited course of psychotherapy (typically 10-20 sessions over several months) that includes these elements reduces PTSD symptoms. Randomized controlled trials have shown that it is superior to both a wait list control condition and to supportive counseling.34, 35
PTSD prevention  There are currently no empirically validated interventions for preventing posttraumatic stress in injured children. The adult literature on secondary prevention post-trauma provides some ideas in this regard.36 However, this literature also contains an important note of caution, in that some early interventions have been shown to have no effect on posttraumatic stress responses and perhaps even to exacerbate these responses for some individuals.37 Current evidence strongly suggests that we screen trauma-exposed individuals and target interventions only to those at most risk. It may, in fact, be ineffective or harmful to apply intensive preventive interventions to all injured patients.36 For all trauma-exposed individuals, caring acknowledgement of their experience and the provision of information about normal stress responses are appropriate and helpful. For individuals assessed to be at risk or experiencing acute distress, we can provide psychoeducation that encourages the natural processes of coping and social support.36, 38 In addition, we can educate about specific reactions, such as hyperarousal, and coach children and parents how to cope with these reactions.39 It is important to promote child and parent responses that increase social support and reduce counter-productive coping strategies (such as avoidance or increased alcohol use).40 For individuals with acute stress disorder, there is growing support for brief CBT approaches.41 The cutting edge of current research and practice in early posttraumatic intervention is a systematic investigation of which interventions work, for whom, during which time period post-trauma, and in which service delivery context.36
Implications for emergency physicians  Children with traumatic injuries in the ED offer us the opportunity to screen and provide early interventions for the secondary prevention of PTSD. ED physicians can play a pivotal role in promoting resilience and emotional recovery for injured children in their care.42 Screen to identify children at risk for PTSD Identifying and addressing a child’s risk for future psychological sequelae during an ED visit for traumatic injury presents several challenges. Chief among these are time limitations and the difficulty of differentiating normal reactions to trauma from the reactions that presage continuing problems. The majority of injured children will experience some acute trauma-related stress symptoms, but only a portion of these children will develop PTSD or other sequelae.1 A particular challenge is that, by definition, symptoms must persist for at least one month for PTSD to be diagnosed. There are a few evidence-based early markers that are easily assessed by ED and trauma clinicians. Empirical evidence has shown that some common-sense markers (eg, injury severity) are useful predictors of psychological outcomes. On the other hand, for violently injured adolescents, acute stress symptoms in the ED appear to be predictive of risk for later PTSD symptomology.15 The Screening Tool for Early Predictors of PTSD (STEPP) may be a useful tool for children with unintentional injuries.43 The STEPP is an empirically-derived tool consisting of 4 yes/no questions for the child, 4 for the parent, and 4 items easily obtained from the medical record. STEPP items predicting child PTSD include female gender, prior behavior or attention problems, having an elevated heart rate at the time of ED triage, having an extremity fracture, the child’s exposure to others injured at the same time, separation from parents at the time of injury and ED treatment, and whether the child was extremely frightened or thought that s/he might die (Table 4). The STEPP has demonstrated excellent predictive qualities for children with unintentional injuries and for their parents.43  | Female gender |  |
 | Prior behavior or attention problems (reported by parent) |  |
 | Elevated heart rate at the time of ED triage |  |
 | Child’s exposure to others injured at the same time |  |
 | Separation from parents at the time of injury and ED treatment |  |
 | The child was extremely frightened or thought that s/he might die. |  | | | |
Address parent responses Parents may be intensely distressed after their child is injured, irrespective of the child’s distress. This can have significant impact on the psychological health of the child. ED clinicians need to be particularly attentive to parent responses, and to the messages that parents receive as part of emergency care and discharge instructions. For example, Keisha’s parents might have benefited from written discharge instructions that described posttraumatic stress reactions and helped parents identify persistent symptoms of anxiety and avoidance in their child or themselves. This approach is consistent with best practices in family-centered care.44 Parents need to hear that they can promote their child’s coping and resilience by promoting a return to normal activities as much as possible, and by direct and open discussion of the child’s traumatic experience. Perhaps most important is helping parents to recognize their own responses, and to consider that they may need some support in coping with these reactions. Effective support might well come from family and friends, but professional consultation is warranted for prolonged reactions that impede the parent’s own return to normal functioning. Provide basic information and refer for further assessment when indicated Parents and children may benefit from written discharge instructions that include suggestions for psychological recovery, as well as wound care or medical follow-up.42 For most families, attentive care, information about what to expect in terms of the range of psychological reactions, and suggestions to parents and children about ways to promote resilience will be enough. But for those children or parents who have multiple risk factors (eg, assessed via a brief screening) or who show intense acute distress, referral for a more thorough assessment with a social worker, psychologist, or psychiatrist is warranted. Build professional awareness of psychological aspects of trauma recovery Throughout the continuum of care, parents and children need health care providers who recognize the potential for PTSD development even after minor injuries, are able to recognize traumatic stress symptoms, and who, in their interactions with children and family members, promote the child’s and the parent’s resilience and coping responses. During the course of normal interactions necessary for care, ED clinicians can: (1) talk very briefly with children and teens about the range of normal reactions to trauma (“You might find yourself thinking about it a lot, or trying hard NOT to think about it, or feeling a little jumpy—these reactions usually get better in a few weeks”); (2) look for opportunities to educate and support parents, by mentioning normal reactions to trauma—both their own and their child’s; and (3) suggest how parents’ own natural reactions may help or hinder their ability to support their child in coping with a frightening and potentially traumatic experience. ED physicians can also serve as models for trainees and students in this regard. Anticipatory guidance for parents and patients When the opportunity exists for a more extended conversation with the child or adolescent patient or his/her parent, it is useful to provide anticipatory guidance regarding posttraumatic stress reactions to a traumatic injury (Table 5). Such guidance is particularly important for children, teens, or parents with multiple risk factors (see TABLE 3, TABLE 4), or evident acute distress. The following are core messages to be incorporated whenever possible: (1) it is normal for children to have reactions to an injury. They may think about it a lot, and may try to stay away reminders of what happened. These reactions are often the child’s or teen’s way of trying to deal with what happened. (2) Sometimes the reactions last too long or are too extreme, and they become problems. (3) Parents can help children recover well by talking openly about the injury event, answering the child’s questions, and gently encouraging the child to talk about it. Older children and teens may benefit from writing down their experiences and feelings. (4) Parents should have the child resume normal activities as much as possible given physical recovery from the injury. (5) Parents should ask for help if a child has intense or persisting reactions that get in the way of returning to normal activities allowed by the child’s physical recovery. (6) Finally, parents should be encouraged to seek support for themselves if talking about what happened makes the parent tense or upset.  | 1. It may be normal for a child to try to deal with what happened by: |  |
 | • Thinking a lot about their injury event; |  |
 | • Staying away from reminders of what happened. |  |
 | 2. These reactions may become problems if they last too long or are too extreme. |  |
 | 3. To help your child recover: |  |
 | • Talk openly about the injury event; |  |
 | • Answer your child’s questions, and gently encourage him or her to talk about it; |  |
 | • Older children and teens may benefit from writing down their experiences and feelings; |  |
 | • Have your child resume normal activities as much as physically possible. |  |
 | 4. Ask for help if: |  |
 | • Your child has intense or persisting reactions that get in the way of normal activities; |  |
 | • Talking about what happened makes you tense or upset. |  |
 | • If you think that you or your child needs help, please call________ |  | | | |
Conclusions  Clinicians should be aware of the psychological ramifications of even minor injuries in children. Evaluation of these sequelae can begin in the immediate post-injury time period. We are beginning to learn how to identify high-risk individuals, and how to provide effective targeted secondary prevention for injury-related posttraumatic stress. Emergency physicians can offer appropriate anticipatory guidance to families to help reduce the persistence and severity of these posttraumatic stress reactions. References  1.
1
Winston F, Kassam-Adams N, Vivarelli-O’Neill C.
Acute stress disorder symptoms in children and their parents after pediatric traffic injury.
Pediatrics. 2002;109:e90. 2.
2
Marshall R, Olfson M, Hellman F.
Comorbidity, impairment, and suicidality in subthreshhold PTSD.
Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:1467–1473.
CrossRef
3.
3
Fletcher K.
Childhood Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
In:
Mash E, Barkley R editor. Child Psychopathology. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1996;p. 242–276. 4.
4
Fairbank J, Schlenger W, Saigh P.
An epidemiologic profile of post-traumatic stress disorder (Prevalence, comorbidity and risk factors).
In:
Friedman M, Charney D, Deutch A editor. Neurobiological and Clinical Consequences of Stress (From Normal Adaptation to PTSD). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1995;p. 415. 5.
5
Norris F.
Epidemiology of trauma (Frequency and impact of different potentially traumatic events on different demographic groups).
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992;60:409–418.
CrossRef
6.
6
American Psychiatric Association
.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). (ed 4). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994;. 7.
7
Richmond T.
An explanatory model of variables influencing postinjury disability.
Nurs Res. 1997;46:262–269. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
8.
8
Aaron J, Zaglul H, Emery RE.
Posttraumatic stress in children following acute physical injury.
J Pediatr Psychol. 1999;24:335–343. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
9.
9
Daviss WB, Mooney D, Racusin R.
Predicting posttraumatic stress after hospitalization for pediatric injury.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;39:576–583. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (785 KB)
|
CrossRef
10.
10
DeVries APJ, Kassam-Adams N, Cnaan A.
Looking beyond the physical injury (Post-traumatic stress disorder in children and parents after pediatric traffic injury).
Pediatrics. 1999;104:1293–1299. 11.
11
Di Gallo A, Barton J, Parry-Jones WL.
Road traffic accidents (Early psychological consequences in children and adolescents).
Br J Psychiatry. 1997;170:358–362. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
12.
12
Levi RB, Drotar D, Yeates KO.
Posttraumatic stress symptoms in children following orthopedic or traumatic injury.
J Clin Child Psychol. 1999;28:232–243. 13.
13
Stallard P, Velleman R, Baldwin S.
Prospective study of post-traumatic stress disorder in children involved in road traffic accidents.
Br Med J. 1998;317:1619–1623. 14.
14
Fitzpatrick K, Boldizar J.
The prevalence and consequences of exposure to violence among African-American youth.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993;32:424–430. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (6392 KB)
15.
15
Fein J, Kassam-Adams N, Gavin M.
Persistence of posttraumatic stress in violently injured youth seen in the emergency department.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:836–840. MEDLINE 16.
16
Horowitz K, Weine S, Jekel J.
PTSD symptoms in urban adolescent girls (Compounded community trauma).
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995;34:1353–1361. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (7400 KB)
17.
17
Fein J, Kassam-Adams N, Vu T.
Emergency department evaluation of acute stress disorder symptoms in violently injured youth.
Ann Emerg Med. 2001;28:391–396. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (381 KB)
|
CrossRef
18.
18
Foy D, Madvig B, Pynoos R.
Etiologic factors in the development of posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents.
J Sch Psychol. 1994;34:133–145. 19.
19
Yehuda R, McFarlane AC, Shalev AY.
Predicting the development of posttraumatic stress disorder from the acute response to a traumatic event.
Biol Psychiatry. 1998;44:1305–1313. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (127 KB)
|
CrossRef
20.
20
Bryant RA, Guthrie RM, Moulds MM.
A prospective study of psychophysiological arousal, acute stress disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2000;109:341–344.
CrossRef
21.
21
Richmond T, Kauder D.
Predictors of psychological distress following serious injury.
J Trauma Stress. 2000;13:681–692. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
22.
22
Shalev A, Peri T, Canetti L.
Predictors of PTSD in injured trauma survivors (A prospective study).
Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:219–225. 23.
23
Shalev A, Freedman S, Peri T.
A prospective study of heart rate response following trauma and the subsequent development of posttraumatic stress disorder.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:553–559.
CrossRef
24.
24
Zatzick D, Kang S, Muller H.
Predicting posttraumatic distress in hospitalized trauma survivors with acute injuries.
Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:941–946.
CrossRef
25.
25
Stallard P, Velleman R, Baldwin S.
Recovery from post-traumatic stress disorder in children following road traffic accidents (The role of talking and feeling understood).
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2001;11:37–41. 26.
26
Cella D, Perry S, Kulchycky S.
Stress and coping in relatives of burn patients (A longitudinal study).
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1998;39:159–166. MEDLINE 27.
27
Green B, Korol M, Grace M.
Children and disaster (Age, gender, and parental effects on PTSD symptoms).
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991;30:945–951. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (6589 KB)
28.
28
Sawyer M, Streiner D, Antoniou G.
Influence of parental and family adjustment on the later psychological adjustment of children treated for cancer.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;37:815–822. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (768 KB)
|
CrossRef
29.
29
Saxe GN, Stoddard FJ, Sheridan RL.
PTSD in children with burns (A longitudinal study).
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1998;19(1 pt. 2):S206. 30.
30
Donnelly CL, Amaya-Jackson L, March JS.
Psychopharmacology of pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 1999;9:203–220. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
31.
31
Cohen J.
Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;37:4S–26S. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (18273 KB)
32.
32
Foa E, Meadows E.
Psychosocial treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (A critical review).
Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:449–480. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
33.
33
In:
Foa E, Keane T, Friedman M editor. Effective treatments for PTSD (Practice guidelines from the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies). New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2000;. 34.
34
Foa EB, Dancu CV, Hembree EA.
A comparison of exposure therapy, stress inoculation training, and their combination for reducing posttraumatic stress disorder in female assault victims.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:194–200.
CrossRef
35.
35
Hembree EA, Foa EB.
Posttraumatic stress disorder (Psychological factors and psychosocial interventions).
J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61:33–39. MEDLINE 36.
36
Litz B, Gray M, Bryant R.
Early intervention for trauma (Current status and future directions).
Clin Psychol. 2001;9:112–134. 37.
37
Rose S, Bisson J, Wessely S.
Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), in The Cochrane Library. Oxford, Update Software. 2001;. 38.
38
Rauch S, Hembree E, Foa E.
Acute psychosocial preventive interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder.
Adv Mind Body Med. 2001;17:187–190. MEDLINE 39.
39
Resnick H, Acierno R, Holmes M.
Emergency evaluation and intervention with female victims of rape and other violence.
J Clin Psychol. 2000;56:1317–1333. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
40.
40
Norris F, Byrne C, Diaz E.
Psychosocial Resources in the Aftermath of Natural and Human-Caused Disasters (A Review of the Empirical Literature, with Implications for Intervention). White River Junction, VT: National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; 2001;. 41.
41
Bryant RA, Sackville T, Dang ST.
Treating acute stress disorder (An evaluation of cognitive behavior therapy and supportive counseling techniques).
Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1780–1786. 42.
42
Horowitz L, Kassam-Adams N, Bergstein J.
Mental health aspects of emergency medical services for children (Summary of a consensus conference).
J Pediatr Psychol. 2001;26:491–502. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
43.
43
Winston FK, Kassam-Adams N, Garcia-España JF, Ittenbach R, Cnaan A: A new method for assessing risk of persistent posttraumatic stress in injured children and their parents. Manuscript in review. 44.
44
Baren JM.
Rising to the challenge of family-centered care in emergency medicine.
Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1182–1185. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
a Department of Psychology, Philadelphia, PA, USA b Division of Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA Address reprint requests to Nancy Kassam-Adams, PhD, Department of Psychology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399 USA
PII: S1522-8401(03)00019-3 doi:10.1016/S1522-8401(03)00019-3 © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | 
12 of 12
|
| |
|